Utpal Borpujari

September 20, 2017

Misinformed comments do Priyanka – and the NE – no good

By Utpal Borpujari

 

(Published in http://www.hindustantimes.com on Sept 14, 2017; http://www.hindustantimes.com/bollywood/priyanka-chopra-your-misinformed-comments-about-sikkim-did-a-huge-disservice-to-northeast/story-OdgSqJC3N93AD8FzwTEVJK.html)

Only a couple of days ago, the cleaning lady at one of my fellow Assamese friend’s music studio in Mumbai had asked him where Assam was. The lady is a Tamilian, who has lived in Mumbai for long, and has not gone to school beyond a few classes. My friend jokingly told her, in his Assamese-tinged Hindi, “Jaise aapka Tamil Nadu India ka niche hai, waise hi Assam India ka upar hai”, meaning just as Tamil Nadu is in the south, Assam is in the North – or the Northeast to be more precise.

It’s a fact that a huge number of people still have either no idea about the Northeast region or India, or just have a vague idea about it. And they include not only the unlettered or social-disadvantaged class, but also what we know as educated and socially-aware classes. As a Northeasterner living in Delhi since last 23 years, and having worked in the media all this time, I personally can vouch for the fact that even within the media, the awareness about the Northeast, and its complex issues, is hardly worth anything to write home about.

But it is also a fact that the visibility of and awareness about the region has improved to some extent now, as compared to even, say, ten years ago, thanks to the multitudes of Northeast cultural events, increasing population of people from the region in the NCR and other parts of the country, and also the increasing number of journalists from the region working in the media houses.

From the initial years of anger and outrage that I would feel when someone otherwise “informed” would make a silly observation on the region, now it’s the feeling of more of a pity on such people, as I increasingly feel that the fault lies more in the lack of virtually any information about the region in the primary, secondary and higher education curricula. If we people from the Northeast know about the Chola dynasty or Chhatrapati Shivaji, it’s because we had read about them in our school books, and if people elsewhere do not know about Lachit Barphukan or U Tirot Singh (to give two examples), it’s because they are absent from the school books elsewhere.

But even then, the misinformed comments on Sikkim by UNICEF Goodwill Ambassador, Assam Tourism Brand Ambassador and “Mary Kom” star Priyanka Chopra – in an interview given at the Toronto International Film Festival while talking about her production “Pahuna” – rankles. An unlettered cleaning lady in Mumbai not knowing about Assam is one thing, and a hugely-popular and talented star like Ms Chopra giving wrong information about a region that she is genuinely trying to connect with (if we go by the latest announcement that she is producing an Assamese film with legendary filmmaker Jahnu Barua, coupled with her production of Sikkimese film “Pahuna”) surely is another.

Ms Chopra is a known name now internationally, thanks to her appearances in television series “Quantico” and Hollywood movie “Baywatch”. She is, as we all know, a UNICEF Goodwill Ambassador. And above all, she is the brand ambassador of one of the Northeastern states. Along with that, she is a top name of Indian cinema. So, anything she says, goes out to a huge audience, through conventional media as well as social media.

Therefore, when she says that Sikkim is an insurgency-hit state, and that “Pahuna” is the first feature film to come out of the state, it is quite natural that many would believe both the statements. The only problem is – as social media have already stated emphatically and angrily – that both statements are incorrect. Quite clearly, Ms Chopra is misinformed, or – as most people tend to do – paint the entire Northeastern region with one brush. It is a fact that for most Indians, the term “Northeast” is used to describe a region that has a history of insurgencies, is full of exotic tribes, and a region that lies beyond the mental boundaries of “mainland” India (though it is a dichotomy that the same “mainland” term is never in terms of India’s two island territories of Andaman & Nicobar and Lakshadweep). While it’s a popular coinage, it also works in a strangely negative way – by homogenizing the immense geo-political, social and cultural diversity of the region and its eight states.

But even if one considers this aspect, talking of Sikkim specifically as insurgency affected is far beyond being far fetched. In fact, if there is one state in the Northeast that has stayed free from any such trouble, it’s Sikkim. In fact, it’s one of the most-peaceful states all across India, with an absolutely low crime rate, leave aside insurgency or terrorism. Sikkim actually is mostly talked about for its positive aspects – such as having one of India’s highest per capita incomes, being among the leading states in literacy level, being one of India’s cleanest states, being the first Indian states to be declared Open Defecation Free way back in 2008, and being India’s first – and only one till now – fully organic state.

Sikkim is also a tourism-intensive state, and had led the country in introducing home stays and heli-tourism. A large number of domestic and international tourist visit the peaceful state every year, and Ms Chopra’s comments could hugely impact the tourist inflow as for any lay person, it’s easy to believe a Northeastern state to be insurgency impacted going by the image of the region, especially when it comes from a figure whose comments are quoted widely across media. No wonder, the Sikkim government, along with the people of the state and the region – as well as informed people from across India – has reacted with anger at the comment.

Ms Chopra’s other comment about “Pahuna” being the first film to come out of Sikkim, has also been ridiculed, and rightly so. Sikkim does not have a film industry per se, but films have been made in the state quite regularly. In fact, only this year, Sikkimese film “Ralang Road”, by director Karma Takapa, had its world premiere at the Competition Section of the Karlovy Vary International Film Festival, one of the highly-respected film festivals of the world. The film will also be screened at the forthcoming edition of the MAMI Mumbai International Film Festival. “Acharya” and “Katha” by another young filmmaker, Prashant Rasaily, has also earned acclaim earlier. And these are just three examples from among the films that have been made in Sikkim over the years.

It’s laudable the way a top Bollywood actor like Priyanka Chopra has taken to producing cinema in various Indian languages, including those in languages from states that have very small domestic markets such as Sikkim and Assam, but her comments in the context of “Pahuna” have unnecessarily diminished that effort while belittling the works of the local filmmakers who make films with unimaginably-limited resources.

It’s quite befitting that the actor has tendered her apology to the Government of Sikkim for her comments regarding the state being insurgency affected. Perhaps, she could also issue one more to the filmmakers from Sikkim, whose works have got negated by that interview in Toronto.

May 16, 2011

Fairytale of a little Kalam

By Utpal Borpujari

It is easy to descend to a preachy mood while making a movie on a socially-relevant subject, and there are umpteen number of examples all over India of it. It is equally difficult to take up a theme as depressing as a vast chunk of children from poor Indian families not having access to education and keep the tone warm and fairytale-like even while successfully sending the message across in an entertaining way.

A low-budget Hindi film, produced by an NGO and directed by a first-time director has been able to achieve exactly that, and the world is applauding the achievement. The film we are talking about is I Am Kalam, directed by Delhi-based Nila Madhab Panda and produced by Smile Foundation, which has till now travelled to around 25 film festivals across the globe, sweeping prestigious awards and adulation from both the young and the adult audiences.

With a tone that keeps the mood light-hearted, this indie film starring child actors Harsh Mayar and Husaan Shaad and Bollywood/Hollywood actor Gulshan Grover in an image-reversing role, puts across its message of how the right opportunities can unearth thousands of A.P.J. Abdul Kalams and Lal Bahadur Shastris from among the poor of India, just as these two luminaries had been able to. In fact, the name of the film, says Panda, reflects this fact.

Recognition

Panda has just won the prestigious Aravindan Puraskaram for the best debut director of the year in Indian cinema, given out by the Kerala government, as well as the audience award at the Montreal International Children’s Film Festival (FIFEM).

“A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, one of the most loved Presidents our country, has had to sell newspapers as a child to be able to study. Shastri too had toiled hard to come up in life, becoming one of the tallest political leaders and our prime minister. My film talks of a kid just like them, waiting for the right opportunity in life,” says Panda.

The protagonist of the film, Chhotu (Mayar, a Delhi slum boy who has won the best actor award at the Minsk International Film Festival for his confident and moving performance) is a highly-intelligent boy from a Rajasthani village, forced to work in a roadside dhaba to eke out a living. What he wants to do in life is to become an “officer wearing suit, tie and boot”, but has no wherewithal to even go to school. How he achieves his goal, inspired after listening to a television address by Kalam and overcoming adversities with the help of a few helping individuals, forms the core of the film.

Panda, who hails from the remote Dasharajpur village in Orissa’s backward Sonepur district, has drawn from his childhood experiences to give life to the character.

Like its story, the film too has had a fairytale run in the festival circuit. It won the Young Jury Award as the best feature film of the Indian Panorama section at the 41st International Film Festival of India in Goa, the best feature film award and the Don Quijote Prize of the International Cine Club Federations at the Lucas International Film Festival in Germany, the audience award at the Barbican London Children film festival, and special jury mentions at the Cinekid International Film Festival in Rotterdam and the Ale Kino International Film festival at Poznan (Poland). It earned good reviews at the MAMI International Film Festival in Mumbai and the International Film Festival of Kerala, and was among the handful of Indian films, along with “Dhobi Ghat” and “Pan Singh Tomar”, to have been screened at the 54th BFI Times London Film Festival.

“What has been really heartening is the fact that both children and adult audiences have connected really well to the film, which is reflected by the fact that we have won quite a few audience choice awards in several countries,” says Panda. Smile Foundation, he says, is negotiating with distributors for an early release of the film in India. “It is laudable that an NGO has come forward to produce a film on an important subject like making education accessible for poor children at a time when the government has introduced a path-breaking legislation like the Right to Education Act,” says the director.

Subtle commentary

The film makes a strong comment also on child labour, but not in a didactic manner. The protagonist, in a sense, represents all those ‘Chhotus’ (as children working in roadside eateries or other shops are usually “generically” called across north India, not leaving any scope for their individual identity), and their struggles to access education and a good life. The film’s positive tone means that this Chhotu finally sees a ray of hope, unlike those millions of real life Chhotus who remain unlettered for life because of lack of educational opportunities.

“I deliberately kept this positive tone as I believe that if we try, all of us can be a catalyst for change. My film says that if we make an effort, we will be able to change society. Perhaps because I am a strongly positive person in life, that I felt I should see this serious subject through a positive viewfinder,” says Panda, who is planning his next two films in Hindi, to be shot in Orissa and Meghalaya.

(Published in The Hindu – Magazine Section, 15-05-2011, http://www.hindu.com)

http://www.hindu.com/mag/2011/05/15/stories/2011051550120400.htm

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.