Utpal Borpujari

October 29, 2009

Kaler Rakhal: of Politics and the Masks We Wear

By Utpal Borpujari

Cinema sometimes has this uncanny ability to reflect the immediate realities of the time. Kaler Rakhal (The Understudy), a recent Bengali film by award-winning director Sekhar Das is one such film. Using metaphors and the pastoral landscape of rural West Bengal, Das creates a world that is very real, where simple, gullible commoners become pawns at the hands of ruthless politicians. Eerily, the film resembles to a great extent the cruel world of grassroots politics in West Bengal and elsewhere of recent times, where villagers owing allegiance to one party can kill or maim co-villagers just because they support another party, more often than not their acts remote-controlled by local political-mafia nexus who exploit their belief in ideologies which the power-hungry leaders themselves seldom follow.

Starting from the title itself, Das uses a number of metaphors in his film to tell his story. The story moves forward on two parallel tracks that get combined as the film progresses, with the metaphor of “Bohurupis”, or the traditional travelling performers of mythological dance dramas who wear a mask to become the mythical characters but are forced to wear identities other than their own in real life too, used liberally. In fact, it is the invisible masks that people wear quite often that forms the basis of character graph development in the film – the politician wears the mask of ideology to exploit the gullible, the educated class wears the mask of civility to pretend not seeing the injustices taking place in front of their eyes., and others wear the mask of normalcy to make compromises so that they can lead a normal life forgetting a turbulent past.

Based on a short story titled Du Nombor Ashami (Accuesed No. 2), Kaler Rakhal is about Subol Mondol (a brilliant Parambrata Chatterjee, a heartthrob of Bengali cinema who has gone against his popular image to come up with a convincing portrayal of a simple village youth exploited by the local politicians ruthlessly), who by heart and mind is a “Bohurupi”, but is forced to become a pawn at the hands of the politician-mafia nexus, which forces him often to wear the “mask” of a culprit whom the local corrupt police puts behind the bars every time various political crimes are committed at the local level.

Subol Mandal’s story moves parallel to the story of a young NRI woman, who comes from Germany to do a television programme on the Bohurupi culture but gets entangled in the developing unrest, becoming a victim of sexual violence at the hands of the local ruffians who double up as the henchmen of the political class. Her story moves along with the story of another woman, whose husband, an ideological politician, was bumped off by his corrupt political colleague, with whom she is forced to have a relationship so that she can lead a life of presumed safety. A number of other characters people the film, all representing various facets of exploitation of the poorest, such as a poor Bohurupi exponent who is forced to sell his wife’s body to a local politician just to be able to earn his next meal, the symbolic –though a bit predictable – character of a man who has gone mad because his orchard got “stolen” by the government during the widening of a road, and the old, cultured gentleman (played by thespian Soumitra Chatterjee) who critiques the system but himself is incapable of offering any solace to his young NRI relative who gets raped.

The film’s strong points lie in its strong political undertone and the equally evocative depiction of the cultural milieu that is fighting to keep afloat in the face of the onslaught of modern day ‘entertainment’ which is slowly but surely polluting traditional cultures that are intrinsically linked to the rural society irrespective of religious, caste or community identities. While the political undercurrent of the subject gives a required edgy feel to the film, the cultural aspect is used by the director to use folk music elements that counters this to create a thematic variety, though the number of songs, like the theatrical depiction of the way the local hoodlums, tend to derail the overall pace of the film at certain places.

The film’s soul is the character of Subol, who, to earn some extra money that can assure a proper next meal to his family, quite often plays the role of an accused who goes behind the bars for the crimes committed by local lumpen elements who are the henchmen of the political class. In a sense, Subol represents all those innocent people who unwittingly are forced to become a part of the vicious political system which requires such people to die in demonstrations, to commit self-immolations in protest against something or the other, or to simply shout slogans at rallies, more often than not because that will earn them some money that will assure them a few days of proper livelihood. When Subol, after years of being at the bidding of his political bosses, refuses to go by their dictates finally, he has to pay a heavy price because, ultimately, he knows how the corrupt system works and has the capacity to expose them.

For Das, whose previous two films were Mahulbanir Sereng and Krantikaal, Kaler Rakhal completes a trilogy on the theme of class exploitation. This also happens to be the strongest of the three films. With a cast that comprises Nandana Sen in her first appearance in a Bengali film, Kaler Rakhal makes for compelling viewing. And Das is happy that he has achieved to a great extent what he had set out to do. “I had this story with me, written by Swapan Bandopadhyay, 2005 onwards, and as days progressed, I became convinced that it could be a really great story to tell. As an artiste, I felt I have the responsibility to record what is happening around us,” says Das.

Das feels that it is pointless doing a film unless it reflects the times we are in. “I always debate with my friends that we can otherwise do just aesthetic exercises. I tour villages, though I am an urbanite, and those images attract me more than my very close set up.” Being true to the setting, he used the colloquial language in the film. “I am an ardent fan of Bertolt Brecht and Habib Tanveer, so I thought why not use the bastardized language instead of the pure language as I thought that would be much more effective and maybe more entertaining,” says Das, who shot the film in areas like Ichamati, the Sundarbans and  Bolepur.

(Published in Deccan Herald, www.deccanherald.com, www.deccanheraldepaper.com, 25-10-2009)

Advertisements

DVD review: The Godfather Boxset

By Utpal Borpujari

It is one of the all-time classics of cinema, but it almost did not get made. The Godfather is what engrossing cinema is all about, and after 37 years after the first part of the trilogy was released, it remains compulsive viewing.

This five-DVD boxset is what is called a collector’s edition, and that is not because of the three parts of the movie, which have been available in the market for several years now, but because of the two DVDs that provide “supplements” about the film. And what supplements!

The first supplement DVD contains the special features that had come with the DVD of the film when it was first released – a documentary on the making of the three films, additional films, a featurette on the locations, the music, the Corleone family tree, storyboards and photo galleries. The second supplement DVD contains what is previously unseen – features on “The Masterpiece that Almost Wasn’t”, “When the Shooting Stopped”, “Emulsional Rescue”, “The Godfather on the Red Carpet” and four short films on the film.

The films themselves remain as terrific cinema as they were, and with their restored version in 5.1 Dolby stereo sound, the viewing experience is now ever than better.

The boxset is a visual lesson on how great cinema get made – more often than not by accident – as a viewing of the three films never tell you the story that the two supplement DVDs tell, of how it was a sheer providence that the film got made despite all kinds of setbacks, including a massive lack of faith on the part of the Paramount Pictures’ executives in the directorial vision of Coppola, who got the job of directing The Godfather after Sergio Leone and Peter Bogdanovich declined it. The studio also had major disagreements with Coppola on casting, including that of Marlon Brando in the iconic role of Don Corleone, and of the then relatively-unknown Al Pacino as Michael Corleone.

The film, particularly the first two parts, are anyway there for you – as masterpieces – but it is the story behind the story that makes this DVD set a treasure to add to your collection.

(Published in Deccan Herald, www.deccanherald.com, www.deccanheraldepaper.com, 25-10-2009)

http://www.deccanherald.com/content/32202/a-true-collectors-edition.html

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.