Utpal Borpujari

July 8, 2010

Haasan retro in Delhi sets IFFI anomaly right

By Utpal Borpujari

Superstar Kamal Haasan, who had refused to have a retrospective at the last International Film Festival of India (IFFI) because only three of his films were being shown there, has now been honoured with a special retrospective of seven films celebrating his 50 years in the industry.

The three-day retrospective kicked off at the Siri Fort Auditorium in the capital Friday evening in the presence of Haasan and Information & Broadcasting Minister Ambika Soni, the occasion used by the former to announce his plans to direct more films in the near future.

While the last IFFI in Goa had restrospectives of Saumitra Chatterjee, Asha Parekh and Sharmila Tagore, all of whom had completed 50 years in cinema, Haasan had declined to have a retrospective since it would have just three of his films.

Both Haasan and the government, however, had valid arguments on the issue, which is why both sides had agreed to have a separate retrospective of the star incoporating seven films, a number insisted upon by Haasan.

While Haasan had argued that three films would not justify his wide repertoire, which includes films in all the four South Indian languages as well as Hindi, apart from his directorial ventures, the Directorate of Film Festivals (DFF), the organisers of IFFI, had expressed its inability to screen more than three films because of the tight schedule of the festival.

Immediately thereafter, Soni had announced that there would be a separate retrospective of the star in Delhi later.

Haasan, who flew in from Italy where he is shooting for his latest film, was at his gracious best at the inauguration of the retrospective with his film Hey Ram!, and said he hoped that the next decade would be the best years of his career as he was writing screenplays and planning to direct more films.

“I am not the one to languish about what has been done. I am looking forward to the next 10 years which I hope will be the best years of my career,” said the star who had started his acting career as a five year old in 1959 with the Tamil film Kalathoor Kannamma.

The retrospective comprises, apart from Hey Ram!, Anbe Sivam, Virumandi, Thevar Magan, Sagara Sangamam, Dasavatharam and Nayagan.

Giving a peek into his plans, Haasan said, “I will direct more films. I have done Hey Ram and Virumandi and there will be more… There are so many actors, people and talents, who haven’t got their moment of glory and if possible I would like to help all of them,” he added.

“This journey seems very short. I owe a lot to my supportive family and my gurus, who taught me what I am today. Especially, two of my gurus paid me to learn from them. I am made up of all those blocks they put in. It’s not humility. I have a talent of my own but I owe it up to them,” Haasan said a bit philosophically.

Soni, felicitating Haasan, described him as a pan-India phenomenon and said, “Haasan as an artist over a period of time has balanced cinema with realism. His portrayal of different characters created a pan India phenomenon, breaking the barriers of age groups, language and commercial interest. Some of his portrayals have left a deep imprint across all generations,” she said. 

(Published in Deccan Herald, www.deccanherald.com, www.deccanheraldepaper.com, 04-07-2010)


December 14, 2009

40th IFFI: Debutants shine in Indian Panorama

By Utpal Borpujari

The Indian Panorama section of the International Film Festival of India (IFFI) has over the years provided the cinema world a window to what is supposedly the best of Indian cinema of that year. It is through the Indian Panorama films that foreign film festival programmers have discovered many talents to be taken to the world stage. It is also the section that more or less captures the ups and downs of the filmmaking trends in the country’s myriad languages.

But over the years, Indian Panorama, despite still being the most-respected platform for Indian films seeking an international focus in an Indian festival, has slightly lost its sheen. This has more to do with several other film festivals assuming important proportions within India – Kolkata, Kerala, Mumbai (MAMI) for example – than to any diminishing of the Panorama’s importance. More pertinently, with Kolkata and MAMI happening before IFFI, quite a few of new Indian films get shown in these festivals before taking their bow at IFFI.

This year too, at the 40th IFFI, the Indian Panorama presented a kaleidoscopic view of the country’s fiction cinema in all its riches as also warts. In fact, this year’s Panorama section presented a highly-uneven mixture of some fine cinema, some mediocre work and a few which shows up the country’s film movement in a not-so-positive light. Of course, finally it is for the jury – this time chaired by filmmaker Muzaffar Ali – to decide which films to include in the section, but then the selection also reflects on the jury itself. This year it was especially so as one member – Gautaman Bhaskaran – publicly questioned the jury’s decisions and alleged that two of his colleagues – Ali and producer Bobby Bedi – had not only remained absent during a large part of the selection screenings but also insisted on inclusion of specific films.

The best of this year’s lot comprised some gems from Marathi cinema – the industry, always in the shadow of the glamorous Hindi film industry in Mumbai, in recent years has thrown up quite a few excellent movies – along with some excellent works particularly in Konkani, Bengali and Hindi. The Panorama comprised 26 films, including five picked from a shortlist of commercial fare sent in by the Film Federation of India, a practice started since last year after the abolition of the Indian Mainstream section, though the Directorate of Film Festivals for some reason chose not to mark them out as so, unfairly for the 21 that got selected competing with about 100 others as against this “quota” for the mainstream.

The best of the lot this year, without doubt, was Laxmikant Shetgaonkar’s Konkani film Paltadcho Manis (The Man Beyond the Bridge), an almost meditative film which has proved that the young filmmaker is a major hope for Indian cinema, provided he can live up to the promise he has shown in this film. Set in the thick forests of Karnataka-Goa border, the story takes one to the life of Vinayak, a lonely forest guard and his relationship with a mentally-unsound woman. Through the story, the National Film Development Corporation (NFDC)-produced film raises questions regarding morality and ethics as practised by the society as well as its sense of responsibility towards the hapless.

If it gave the perfect start to the Indian Panorama as the opening film of the section, the package shone through several other efforts, significantly, like Shetgaonkar’s, all by first-time directors. Satish Manwar’s Gabhricha Paus (The Damned Rain) in Marathi and Atanu Ghosh’s Angshumaner Chhobi (A Film Made by Angshuman) in Bengali, both India’s entries to the IFFI’s competition section, along with Paresh Mokashi’s Harishchandrachi Factory in Marathi, were definitely the top of the lot in the section where there were works by 11 first-time directors.

Manwar’s film marks the emergence of another powerful voice in the already-shining Marathi film industry, as it uses black humour to tell the story of farmers’ suicides, the biggest tragedy to hit many parts of rural India, and more particularly of Vidarbha region in Maharashtra, in recent years. The film opens with scenes of a farmer committing suicide, followed by how the worried wife and mother of another debt-ridden farmer decides to keep an eye on him, fearing he too might end his life. A powerful portrayal of our times, it also serves up as a strong contrast to the mainstream cinema which has almost forgotten to depict rural India barring stray exceptions, and does that in a way which is neither didactic nor preachy. On the other hand, Ghosh’s film takes one into the complex world of the human mind through the story of a young filmmaker who wants to make a film with a retired actor and a recalcitrant actress despite their reluctance to come on screen. Slightly weakened by an unnecessary lengthy murder investigation subplot, the film succeeds largely to an otherwise nuanced screenplay and superb acting the thespian Soumitra Chatterjee, Indrani Haldar, Indraneil Sengupta and Tota Roychowdhury.

Mokashi’s film, on the other hand, takes one in a roller coaster ride, using comedy to recreate the story of how Dada Saheb Phalke had made India’s first film, Raja Harishchandra. The film, India’s entry for the Best Foreign Language Academy Award in 2010, effectively uses humour to tell what is perhaps the most-important story of Indian cinema’s birth. The other first timers who impressed with their work are Sona Jain, whose For Real (English), starring Sarita Choudhury of Mira Nair’s Mississippi Masala and Kama Sutra fame, explores how young minds are impacted by disharmony among adults at home, and Aijaz Khan, whose The White Elephant (Hindi), despite the awkwardness of using Malayalam words for the authenticity-effect, pleases one to a great extent through its a fable-like story set in Kerala and starring Tannishtha Chatterjee and Prroshanth Narayanan.

Some of the other Panorama films that impressed were Sumitra Bhave and Sunil Sukhthankar’s Ek Cup Chya (A Cup of Tea) (Marathi), which sets a fine example of how an activist film should be made through its story of a lowly-placed government servant’s use of the Right to Information (RTI) Act to fight the system, debutant Avantika Hari’s Land Gold Woman (English) which brings alive the social malaise of honour killings among some South Asian communities in Britain, and Nandita Das’ Firaaq (Hindi) that took a sensitive look at the scars left in individual minds by communal violence. Also impressive was Aniruddhar Roy Chowdhury’s Antaheen (The Endless Wait) (Bengali), a take on relationships in an urban backdrop uplifted by the dignified acting of Sharmila Tagore, Aparna Sen, Rahul Bose and Radhika Apte.

But the weaker links in this year’s Panorama, unfortunately came from the veterans. Be it M S Sathyu’s Ijjodu (Kannada) or Shaji N Karun’s Kutty Srank (Malayalam), viewers were left asking if they are from the same masters who gave us classics like Garam Hawa and Piravi but now have given us meandering executions of interesting premises. Comparatively, another veteran Buddhadeb Dasgupta’s Janala (Window) stimulated the senses better, though he too could be charged with being repetitive with certain signature motifs of his. Rituparno Ghosh’s Shob Charitro Kalponik, starring Bipasha Basu and Projenjit, despite being quite verbose as his recent works has been, provided viewers with a world that scratches more than the surface of relationships. In contrast, a few of the mainstream “quota” entries, usually the weakest links in the package, this year provided a window to fresh ideas at work in the Hindi industry – be in Anurag Kashyap’s Dev.D, Dibakar Banerjee’s Oye Lucky, Lucky Oye! and Vishal Bhardwaj’s Kaminey.

(Published in Deccan Herald, www.deccanherald.com, www.deccanheraldepaper.com, 13-12-2009)


Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.